How would you evaluate a coding agent, and why is a single SWE-bench score not enough to trust it?
Candidates who cite one leaderboard number fail the follow-up. The interviewer wants you to name what SWE-bench measures, what it cannot (long-horizon multi-file refactors, real tool use, business logic), and which complementary benchmarks close those gaps.
Updated Sep 2026 · Grounded in real GenAI, LLM, and AI/ML engineering interview loops and written to a senior-engineer editorial bar.
Candidates who cite one leaderboard number fail the follow-up. The interviewer wants you to name what SWE-bench measures, what it cannot (long-horizon multi-file refactors, real tool use, business logic), and which complementary benchmarks close those gaps.
Lead with where the obvious approach breaks, because that is the judgment they are screening for — most candidates jump straight to the happy path and lose the room.
Then walk the failure back through the pipeline in order, naming the one metric the customer's exec sponsor actually cares about before you propose the fix.
